Ask Question
HistoryHistory
3 May, 00:58

What had apparently prevented archaeological digging at the supposed site of james fort?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 3 May, 01:03
    0
    The answer to this question is: Until 1996, It had been thought that James Fort had been built on the swampy edge of the James River

    As it turned out, James Fort is located on South Dakota, Near Mitchell. This fort was originally built in 1865 by the soldiers that were sent the order to protect settlers from potential attacks from the natives near that location.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “What had apparently prevented archaeological digging at the supposed site of james fort? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What 6 East Asian nations were part of SEATO in the 1950s
Answers (1)
What was the bubonic plague?
Answers (2)
Which of the following was the main reason for the Lewis and Clark expedition to the pacific northwest? a) the nootka sound controversy b) the louisiana purchase c) the hudson bay company d) the astorians
Answers (1)
what makes people perceive regions differently?
Answers (1)
Why were slaves not asked to render military services?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
After the Tet offensive, how did the united states hope to end the vietnam war?
Answers (1)
Why did European countries practicing imperialism seek to control major water ports through out the world?
Answers (1)
Which best describes the purpose of Jim Crow laws?
Answers (1)
Certificate of ownership in a company which entitles the shareholder to vote for the board of directors of the corporation.
Answers (1)
How did Canals during the industrial revolution impact development in the United States?
Answers (1)
Home » History » What had apparently prevented archaeological digging at the supposed site of james fort?
Sign Up Forgot Password?