Ask Question
6 March, 15:22

How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?

It extended a military campaign against Native American people's who had farm land

It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interest of Georgians against Cherokees.

It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders Of any us state

It ignored that fact that Indian lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United states

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 6 March, 15:48
    0
    The answer it nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees. In the court case Worcester v. Georgia, the U. S. Supreme Court apprehended in 1832 that the Cherokee IndiansSamuel Worcester established a nation holding separate sovereign powers. Though the decision became the groundwork of the principle of tribal sovereignty in the twentieth century, it did not defend the Cherokees from being detached from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling? It extended a military campaign against Native American ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers