Ask Question
31 March, 02:07

The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legi

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 31 March, 02:15
    0
    Thi question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

    The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legitimate state interest and thus overturned it.

    Answer: intermediate scrutiny

    Explanation:

    In United States v. Windsor, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the lower court's decision that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional.

    The court found that, since homosexuals had been historically subjected to discrimination, they could be considered as a group that falls under a "quasi-suspect classification", and therefore intermediate scrutiny could be applied.

    DOMA was deemed unconstitutional under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment because it didn't pass that test.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers