Ask Question
25 August, 10:18

Should presidents be limited to two terms in office? why or why not

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 25 August, 10:20
    0
    The reason that they were was because of FDR famously holding four terms in office, presumably because it would be a poor example for a democratic nation to have a single elected leader for such a long period of time. There are probably multiple arguments both for and against allowing multiple terms in office, however.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Should presidents be limited to two terms in office? why or why not ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers