Ask Question
8 January, 09:23

In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields's lie was? A. aintentional. B. protected by free speech. C. damaging to soldiers. D. unintentional.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 8 January, 09:44
    0
    C) Damaging to soildiers
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields's lie was? A. aintentional. B. protected by free ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers