Ask Question
2 February, 01:00

Select the correct answer.

Why do federal district courts not try cases dealing with military matters, grievances against the government, or tax disputes?

OA.

They cannot be expected to rule impartially on cases involving the government.

OB.

Original jurisdiction for such cases belongs to the Supreme Court.

OC.

Such cases are tried only in state courts, not in federal courts.

D.

Congress has created specialized courts to deal with such cases.

Reset

Next

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 2 February, 01:18
    0
    D). Congress has created specialized courts to deal with such cases.

    Explanation:

    The federal district courts were established by the United States' Congress subject to the 'Judiciary Act of 1789' to primarily deal with the criminal as well as civil cases. These courts do not interfere in the cases associated with the military law, grievances in opposition to the government, or disputes associated with the taxation as these matters are different from the civil affairs. Thus, 'congress has created 'specialized courts' to handle these cases' as military matters must be solved in reference to the military law which is difficult for civil courts to deal with. Similarly, the other disputes against taxation policy or government has special legal provisions that requires special concern. Hence, option D is the correct answer.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Select the correct answer. Why do federal district courts not try cases dealing with military matters, grievances against the government, ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers