World war one in World War II were completely different conflicts. They had very little to do with each other.

Which statement best represents a counter claim to the claim made in this passage?

A) The peace treaty that ended World War I credit conditions that lead directly to the World War II

B) atomic weapons were used in world war two but we're never used during world war one

C) The many of the same countries fault in both world wars their leaders were different

D) World war one was for in 1910s while World War II was mostly fought in 1940s

Question

Mae

History

7 January, 05:47

World war one in World War II were completely different conflicts. They had very little to do with each other.

Which statement best represents a counter claim to the claim made in this passage?

A) The peace treaty that ended World War I credit conditions that lead directly to the World War II

B) atomic weapons were used in world war two but we're never used during world war one

C) The many of the same countries fault in both world wars their leaders were different

D) World war one was for in 1910s while World War II was mostly fought in 1940s

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Brenton Hobbs · Answer 1

A

Explanation:

The treaty of Versailles, which was signed after WWI, restricted Germany in many ways, they were forced to pay off debts and keep a very small military. This led to the anger of Germany and other Axis aligned countries.