Ask Question
HistoryHistory
20 June, 21:43

Would a stalemate cause a war to be over quicker or take a long time to fight?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 20 June, 22:04
    0
    It depends. A stalemate means that no one is close to winning, neither side can make a decision. Based on that I would say it would take longer to fight because they cannot make a decision.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Would a stalemate cause a war to be over quicker or take a long time to fight? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
7. The essay "African Migration to Colonial America" claims that the Middle Passage represents black people's "will to survive.
Answers (1)
Who was the last group to invade Rome before it fell?
Answers (2)
Which was a primary reason for the disaster at fort duquesne
Answers (2)
How did the age of exploration impact europe history channe?
Answers (1)
When the audience knows more about the characters' situations than the characters know themselves it is called what?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
How do the elements of culture influence a group during the American Revolution?
Answers (1)
Why is the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade so controversial.
Answers (1)
What is the Protestant reform Counter Reformation?
Answers (1)
Explain how the civil war changed the lives of african americans
Answers (1)
As the civil war began president Lincoln accepted the belief that
Answers (1)
Home » History » Would a stalemate cause a war to be over quicker or take a long time to fight?
Sign Up Forgot Password?