Ask Question
14 September, 11:54

I'm Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the:

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 14 September, 12:01
    0
    If your answers choices are

    a: freedom of assembly

    b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure

    c: protection against double jeopardy

    d: right to avoid self-incrimination

    Then the correct answer is B protection against unreasonable search and seizure
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “I'm Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the: ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers