History

11 June, 01:02

In worcester v. georgia, supreme court justice john marshall declared: "the act of georgia under which the plaintiff [worchester] was prosecuted is void. the acts of georgia are [against] the constitution, laws, and treaties of the united states." this ruling supports the idea of:

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “In worcester v. georgia, supreme court justice john marshall declared: "the act of georgia under which the plaintiff [worchester] was ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

What was an unintended effect of the sinking of the Lusitania?

What do you think was the most significant victory of the civil rights movement give at least three reasons to back up your answers

Was NOT part of the Union's three-part plan to conquer the South.

Which people would most likely oppose manifest destiny? select the best answer from the choices provided. american indians in the plains yeoman farmers in the south railroad line investors in new york wealthy planters in the south

what ruling did the supreme court make on whether or not students can be required to say the pledge of allegiance in 1943

New Questions in History

As the Jews were being forced into the ghetto they could take only what they could carry. In some cases they were given as little as 15 minutes to gather their belongings.

Impact of printing press

What is the first species of humans found outside Africa? 1. Homo sapiens 2. Homo erectus 3. Homo habilis

Which of the following events preceded the independence of the Soviet satellites

Which of the following is evidence that flowing water once existed on the surface of Antarctica? (check all that apply) Question 4 options: Fossils of plants Fossils of animals Existence of sandstone formations, which is a type of sedimentary rock