Which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during World War I and World War II? More soldiers died as a result of incorrect blood typing. More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home. More donations were needed as a result of poor storage techniques. More organizations spoke out against the war.

Question

Stacy Rangel

History

3 November, 13:08

Which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during World War I and World War II? More soldiers died as a result of incorrect blood typing. More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home. More donations were needed as a result of poor storage techniques. More organizations spoke out against the war.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Paxton Cobb · Answer 1

More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.

Explanation:

Losing a limb in combat is a life-threatening injury because of the extreme blood loss, and the possibility of infection. The fact that more amputated soldiers were able to return home after World War II than World War I is a telling sing that medical professionals improved their methods to handle with haemorrhages.

Talon Livingston · Answer 2

Option B) More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.