Ask Question
11 June, 08:25

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 11 June, 08:33
    0
    Well sometimes you may not have access to a document that was made during the same time period as the historical subject that is being studied. Therefore, a secondary source would be better to use to understand more about subject you are studing.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers