In the Fawkes v. Texas trial, defense attorney Sunil Sharma wanted to question his defendant's accuser in court. Which constitutional clause can Sharma invoke to do so?

Question

Ellie Padilla

History

12 January, 18:51

In the Fawkes v. Texas trial, defense attorney Sunil Sharma wanted to question his defendant's accuser in court. Which constitutional clause can Sharma invoke to do so?

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Tess Butler · Answer 1

The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

There is said, verbatim: "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him."

All this means that the accused must, is legal duty, to have a face-to-face confrontation, be present there to be asked.

Savanna Michael · Answer 2

Sharma should invoke the confrontation clause of the 6th Amendment which gives the accused the right to question their accuser.