In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspectA. already has a criminal record. B. puts public safety at immediate risk. C. looks as if he or she has just committed a crime. D. is someone the arresting officer already knows.

Question

Brent Andrews

History

30 March, 17:51

In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspectA. already has a criminal record. B. puts public safety at immediate risk. C. looks as if he or she has just committed a crime. D. is someone the arresting officer already knows.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Patience Pollard · Answer 1

The correct answer is option is b: " Puts public safety at immediate risk".

Explanation:

In this supreme court ruling there is an exception of the person not being read their Miranda rights in case that they are a dangeour to themselves or others.