Ask Question
30 March, 17:51

In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspectA. already has a criminal record. B. puts public safety at immediate risk. C. looks as if he or she has just committed a crime. D. is someone the arresting officer already knows.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 30 March, 18:08
    0
    The correct answer is option is b: " Puts public safety at immediate risk".

    Explanation:

    In this supreme court ruling there is an exception of the person not being read their Miranda rights in case that they are a dangeour to themselves or others.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspectA. already has a criminal ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers