What do the cases marbury v madison, mcculloch v maryland, gibbons v ogden and dartmouth v woodward have in common?

What they have in common was the following:

Explanation:

Both of these cases involved imposing restrictions on the state government and both ruled in favor of the federal government, demonstrating that, if ever there was a dispute between the federal government and a state government, the federal government would automatically win. McCulloch vs. Maryland ruled that the federal government could not tax the state governments, and Gibbons vs. Ogden ruled that the federal government alone had the power to regulate interstate trade. The Supreme Court has said the federal government is winning in both cases.