A man is convicted of a crime but did not have an attorney to represent him at his trial. Under what circumstances would this be unconstitutional according to Gideon v. Wainwright? If the man was unable to afford an attorney and the court refused to provide one If the man chose to not use his right to an attorney and represent himself If the man was insane and no attorney would choose to represent him If the man was unaware that he had the right to be represented by an attorney
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A man is convicted of a crime but did not have an attorney to represent him at his trial. Under what circumstances would this be ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
In what ways were the policies of Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin similar?
Answers (1)
What is the sun and what does it mean?
Answers (2)
Select all that apply. Two broad goals achieved by the decisions written by John Marshall were: declaring the Tariff of 1816 unconstitutional establishing the importance of the Supreme Court reducing sectional differences strengthening the Federal
Answers (1)
What rights do the people gain from magna carta
Answers (2)
How did the growth of the railroad contribute to demographic change in New Mexico
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
What happened to the Virginia Company once Jamestown was settled
Answers (1)
What are the religious laws for Judaism, Christianity, Islam?
Answers (1)
What is some evidence that the central government created by the articles of confederation was a weak one?
Answers (1)
Why was there a conflict bewteen the Holy Roman Empire and the Roman Catholic Church?
Answers (1)
Which one of these characteristics did all of the first wave of immagrants have in common
Answers (2)