The federalist felt that a bill of rights did not need to be added to the constitution. The anti-federalist, on the other hands, said if a bill of rights was not added to the constitution they would not sign it.

1) explain why each side felt this particular way

2) identify which side won the argument

3) describe why they won the argument using evidence

Question

Jazlynn Hammond

History

17 October, 19:18

The federalist felt that a bill of rights did not need to be added to the constitution. The anti-federalist, on the other hands, said if a bill of rights was not added to the constitution they would not sign it.

1) explain why each side felt this particular way

2) identify which side won the argument

3) describe why they won the argument using evidence

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jeremy Reynolds · Answer 1

1) The federalist felt a bill of rights did not need to be added because they had the 7 prinples

The Anti-federalist felt the bill of right s should be added because they felt that the national government was going to be too strong

2) The Anti-federalist won

3) the anti federalists one because the federalists needed the anti federalists to sign the Constitution