Sign In
Ask Question
Yoselin Herman
History
18 March, 13:35
Provisions of the dread scott case
+1
Answers (
1
)
Hayden Rollins
18 March, 13:38
0
The answer is On March 6, 1857, the United States Supreme Court issues a decision in the Dred Scott case, affirming the right of slave owners to take their slaves into the Western territories, thereby negating the doctrine of popular sovereignty and severely undermining the platform of the newly created Republican Party. At the heart of the case was the most important question of the 1850s: Should slavery be allowed in the West? As part of the Compromise of 1850, residents of newly created territories could decide the issue of slavery by vote, a process known as popular sovereignty. When popular sovereignty was applied in Kansas in 1854, however, violence erupted. Americans hoped that the Supreme Court could settle the issue that had eluded a congressional solution. Dred Scott was a slave whose owner, an army doctor, had spent time in Illinois, a free state, and Wisconsin, a free territory at the time of Scott's residence. The Supreme Court was stacked in favor of the slave states. Five of the nine justices were from the South while another, Robert Grier of Pennsylvania, was staunchly pro-slavery. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the majority decision, which was issued on March 6, 1857. The court held that Scott was not free based on his residence in either Illinois or Wisconsin because he was not considered a person under the U. S. Constitution-in the opinion of the justices, black people were not considered citizens when the Constitution was drafted in 1787. According to Taney, Dred Scott was the property of his owner, and property could not be taken from a person without due process of law. In fact, there were free black citizens of the United States in 1787, but Taney and the other justices were attempting to halt further debate on the issue of slavery in the territories. The decision inflamed regional tensions, which burned for another four years before exploding into the Civil War.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Provisions of the dread scott case ...”
in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How might the mercantile system benefit the mother colony (england) ? And the colonies (american colonies) ?
Answers (1)
Which city-state appears to control the greek peninsula?
Answers (1)
What was the U. S relationship with Japan after world war II
Answers (2)
Support staff in the executive office of the president include
Answers (1)
Which of the following acts did William Lloyd Garrison use in protest? marching on Washington, DC inciting a riot at Harpers Ferry, Virginia burning a copy of the Constitution staging a sit-in at the Library of Congress
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
What is the purpose and importance of the constitution
Answers (1)
3. The right to protest against the government is a Civil _ Liberty Right
Answers (1)
Which event was not related to the anti-Vietnam war movement? a. march on Washington b. assassination of martin Luther king jr c. democratic national convention violence d. Kent state university killings
Answers (2)
Which aspect of nkosi sikelel' iafrika, the south african hymn that eventually became that country's national anthem, reflects the strong western musical influence in south africa and the rest of the continent?
Answers (1)
How might the United States and Mexico be different if the two countries had gone to war in 1916
Answers (1)
Home
»
History
» Provisions of the dread scott case
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?