Ask Question
5 May, 03:34

What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free?

A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.

B. Scott now lived in Missouri where slavery was legal.

C. The owners had purchased Scott legally, so they should be able to take him where they

wished.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 5 May, 03:57
    0
    Answer is A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free? A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process. B. Scott now ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers