History

5 May, 03:34

What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free?

A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.

B. Scott now lived in Missouri where slavery was legal.

C. The owners had purchased Scott legally, so they should be able to take him where they

wished.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free? A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process. B. Scott now ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which ruler divided Rome in order to bring stability to the empire? O Constantinople Maximian O Diocletian O Attila the Hun

How did the napoleonic wars of the 19th century affect europe?

In 1492, which European country took control of the West Indies? A. England B. France C. Holland D. Spain

Which best explains the american decision to drop atomic bombs on japan?

What was the name given to the trade system where ginished manufactured goods were sent to africa exchange for slaves who were sent to the americas and exchanged for colonial goods that would finallybe returned to the home country

New Questions in History

What was the earliest religion practiced in Japan? O Buddhism O Shintoism O Confucianism O Taoism

Radical Republicans:a. fought Andrew Johnson from the day he entered the White House. b. tended to come from the border states that had seen most of the vicious fighting during the Civil War. c.

What were important economic activities in new england colonies?

According to the fugative slave Act, African Americas

How did Olmec civilization differ from Maya civilization?