History

18 July, 03:36

How did the monarchy of England differ from those in continental Europe toward the end of the Reformation?

A. Other monarchs were head of state and church, but England's king was not.

B. The royal line was passed down according to church decision rather than birth.

C. In England, the king's power was limited by a constitution and parliament.

D. The king of England had no authority above him, but other monarchs submitted to the church.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “How did the monarchy of England differ from those in continental Europe toward the end of the Reformation? A. Other monarchs were head of ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which of the following best describes what happened to the Cherokee after relocation? Many died from disease, starvation, and intertribal violence. Their land holdings slowly eroded until the Cherokee were gone.

Who was the worst president

Which are NOT true? Select all that apply. A summons is a call to appear in court. Feudalism is a system of cooperation among peoples which was basically an exchange of gold for protection.

Give a modern day example of an Oligarthy, Aristocracy, Timocracy, Democracy, and Tyranny

In the passage from the declaration of independence, who is the"He" referring to

New Questions in History

List three differences between the virginia plan and the new jersey plan

Which statements accurately describe factors that were part of the decline of the Aztec Empire? Choose all answers that are correct. a. The Aztecs were overwhelmed by superior Spanish weapons. b.

Charles v of the holy roman empire and charles 1 of spain were the same man

Why did Woodrow Wilson believe the League of Nations was critical to future peace?

A major effect of Josef Stalin's policy of Collectivization on Soviet agriculture was