One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?
one historian did not examine primary sources
one of the historians' research has serious flaws
they used different secondary sources for research
their interpretations of historical facts vary
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Explain the conditions and cause of red terror
Answers (1)
The prime meridian is a line of
Answers (2)
These trials put Nazi leaders on trial for crimes against humanity. Brussels Rome Nuremberg Paris
Answers (2)
Which of the following is a correct statement about the production of shale oil in the U. S.? Question 44 options: a) If political factors make petroleum expensive or impossible to obtain, the use of shale oil might increase.
Answers (2)
Who is the eighth president?
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
What was the occupation of the father of the man who acted as counsel for Edmund Hampden in the Five Knights' case?
Answers (2)
Who founded a colony the promised religious freedom, equality to all, and fair treatment to native americans?
Answers (1)
What is the structure and language of the declaration of independence
Answers (1)
Who did the alien and sedition acts target
Answers (1)
In shifting to a defense policy based upon the concept of "flexible response," President Kennedy was indicating that he had grave doubts about the value of which previous defense policy?
Answers (1)