How did Belgian imperialism in Africa differ from British imperialism?

A. Belgium treated Africans as second-class citizens with limited rights.

B. Belgium stripped local African leaders of all political influence.

C. Belgium controlled its colonies through economic pressure rather than military force.

D. Belgium sent huge numbers of European immigrants to its colonies.

Question

Ryder

History

23 October, 02:20

How did Belgian imperialism in Africa differ from British imperialism?

A. Belgium treated Africans as second-class citizens with limited rights.

B. Belgium stripped local African leaders of all political influence.

C. Belgium controlled its colonies through economic pressure rather than military force.

D. Belgium sent huge numbers of European immigrants to its colonies.

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Milo Huffman · Answer 1

B. Belgium stripped local African leaders of all political influence.

Explanation:

APEX

Odin · Answer 2

B. Britain tended to keep the leaders in place and but rule from afar and affect the military and economic actions of the regions it gained power over but in Belgium they would strip local African leaders of their power as seen with King Leopoldo II