Ask Question
20 December, 10:56

Stanley is on trial for an attempted burglary. The prosecutor found evidence that could potentially convict Stanley. However, this evidence was obtained from Stanley's mother's house without a search warrant. Why is this evidence considered inadmissible in the court of law?

because it is irrelevant to the case at hand

because it violates the Fourth Amendment

because it defies the judge's good faith

because it questions the jury's

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 20 December, 11:24
    0
    The second answer choice is your answer.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Stanley is on trial for an attempted burglary. The prosecutor found evidence that could potentially convict Stanley. However, this evidence ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers