Ask Question
26 March, 16:59

Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had been committed. a lawyer willing to take the case to trial. a witness to vouch for the accuser's character.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 26 March, 17:03
    0
    I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed proof that a crime had been committed. The accused h ad the right to face the accuser and offer a defense.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had been ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers