Sign In
Ask Question
Punkin
History
23 February, 03:37
Why were strikes risky for workers in the 1920s?
+1
Answers (
1
)
Deangelo Ibarra
23 February, 03:56
0
they say it was Risky because workers could be fired and replaced by cheap laborers such as immigrants and blacks
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Why were strikes risky for workers in the 1920s? ...”
in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which of the following statements is true regarding French colonialism in Southeast Asia in the late 19th century?
Answers (1)
Which of these rights did an indian women have?
Answers (1)
Name the common language of Muslims in religion, law and literature.
Answers (2)
Why was Constantinople called the "New Rome"?
Answers (2)
Who is the first president of the Fifth Republic who led Free France in World War 2
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
How large is the Mid-Atlantic, and How big is New Hampshire? Is New Hampshire in the Mid-Atlantic colonies?
Answers (1)
Why were many rural American dissatisfied with their political leaders in the late 1800s? What political changes did they propose to address their grievances?
Answers (1)
Why did Napoleon want a divorce from Josephine?
Answers (1)
Locuri de importanta istorica intr-o comunitate pot fi: As vrea trei raspunsuri va rog. Urgent!
Answers (1)
Which regions show evidence that crustal uplift was dominant over erosional forces in the past?
Answers (1)
Home
»
History
» Why were strikes risky for workers in the 1920s?
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?