A historian evaluating "For the Equal Rights Amendment" would most likely consider this source to be

Question

Derick Barton

History

24 October, 17:52

A historian evaluating "For the Equal Rights Amendment" would most likely consider this source to be

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Alina Stephens · Answer 1

It considered the source to be unreliable because it talks only on one side of an issue.

Explanation:

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a accesses the importance to change the Constitution of the United States with an aspect to make sure that all citizens of America regardless of gender, have are seen to be equal.

The goal is to end legal disparities in land, jobs, divorce, and other related problems between males and females.

Alice Paul In 1923, presented this Amendment to Parliament as the founding member of the American Women's Association. Before her death in 1977, Paul would work for the ERA rail.

Any Government or the United States on the grounds of sex, shall not, according to the constitution, overturn the equal right.

Dominique Ritter · Answer 2

A historian evaluating "For the Equal Rights Amendment" would most likely consider this source to be unreliable since it introduces only one edge of the matter.

Explanation:

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a measure to change the Constitution of the United States with a view to ensuring that all American citizens have equality regardless of gender.

They aim to put a stop to legal disparities in divorce, land, jobs and other issues between males and females.

In 1923 Alice Paul presented this Amendment to Parliament as the founding member of the American Women's Association. Before her demise in 1977, Paul would work for the ERA rail. "The United States or any Government shall not, on the grounds of sex, abrogate the equal right according to the constitution."