Which of the following is most likely a consequence of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?

A.

Criminal defendants are more likely to hire attorneys to represent them in court.

B.

Police officers are more likely to obtain a search warrant before searching a home.

C.

Criminal defendants are less likely to confess to crimes they did not commit.

D.

Police officers are less likely to search to vehicle of someone stopped for speeding.

Question

Esteban Bowers

History

6 April, 11:46

Which of the following is most likely a consequence of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?

A.

Criminal defendants are more likely to hire attorneys to represent them in court.

B.

Police officers are more likely to obtain a search warrant before searching a home.

C.

Criminal defendants are less likely to confess to crimes they did not commit.

D.

Police officers are less likely to search to vehicle of someone stopped for speeding.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Ruchus · Answer 1

A

Explanation:

The Miranda Rights were a result of Miranda v. Arizona. They require a police officer to recite

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you ... "

when arresting an alleged criminal.