Sign In
Ask Question
Allan Andrade
History
23 September, 12:13
In what sense were the republics in name only
+1
Answers (
1
)
Mireya Hodges
23 September, 12:38
0
They were republics in name only because you could only vote if you were wealthy and had land if you were poor you meant nothing in society
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“In what sense were the republics in name only ...”
in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
America had a large population of what in the early 1900s
Answers (1)
What was the longest-lasting effect of the losses in World War II?
Answers (1)
What is true about Henry Hudson
Answers (1)
How did the fact that other countries in europe has strong rulers affect italy's fate?
Answers (1)
What role did Smith believe government could and should play?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Muslim maritime activities in the Indian Ocean would be most disrupted by which of the sixteenth-century developments?
Answers (1)
How has technology affected the sharing and blending of cultures
Answers (1)
Why did southerners reject lincoln as president?
Answers (1)
Which of president Clinton's efforts to change domestic policy failed?
Answers (2)
All of the following are nonlogeislative powers except
Answers (1)
Home
»
History
» In what sense were the republics in name only
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?