Most people are familiar with the practice of police reading a suspect their rights to legal counsel during an arrest ("You have the right to remain silent ..."), which was established by the case Miranda v. Arizona. If the accused is not informed of these rights, any statements he makes are which of the following?
A.
used to achieve a conviction
B.
considered "bearing witness against oneself"
C.
inadmissible in court
D.
reviewed by a judge to see if these statements were made under duress
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Most people are familiar with the practice of police reading a suspect their rights to legal counsel during an arrest ("You have the right ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What happened at the battle of fallen timbers?
Answers (1)
In the competition for resources, what were early Native American groups more likely to fight over?
Answers (2)
What are your conclusions as to why fog forms better when there are smoke particles in the air?
Answers (1)
Can some women vote before 1920
Answers (1)
Soviet satellites formed in the eastern bloc
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Read the Mungo Lady and Mungo Man Do others in the field of anthropology agree with Dr. Thorne's view? Explain.
Answers (1)
What do you think caused the Great Depression?
Answers (2)
What were two goals of European imperialism
Answers (1)
Which of these statements about the Cuban Missile Crisis is true? a. Fidel Castro''s government had manufactured guided missiles. b. President Kennedy removed nuclear missiles from Turkey to resolve the crisis. c.
Answers (1)
How did Hitler justify his invasion of austria
No Answers