Charles Evans Hughes said dissenting opinions were "an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day." what did he mean? A. Justices who dissent are less intelligent than the majority of the court. B. Justices who dissent are considering the precedents set by past decisions. C. Justices who dissent often feel angry about how the majority of the court interprets the law. D. Justices who dissent may think that future generations will see the issue differently.

Question

Alondra Vargas

History

12 November, 09:30

Charles Evans Hughes said dissenting opinions were "an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day." what did he mean? A. Justices who dissent are less intelligent than the majority of the court. B. Justices who dissent are considering the precedents set by past decisions. C. Justices who dissent often feel angry about how the majority of the court interprets the law. D. Justices who dissent may think that future generations will see the issue differently.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jon Reilly · Answer 1

Justices who dissent may think that future generations will see the issue differently.

Option: (D)

Explanation:

Charles Evans Hughes was an American politician from Republican party. He was the 36th governor of New York, 11th chief justice of united states and 44th United states Secretary of states. According to the statement judiciary contains or bounds goods and evils. Evils, here is whatever contradicts the constitution and hinders the will of people and goods are the definite end like liberty, freedom, equality, justice.