Ask Question
HistoryHistory
3 March, 02:08

A result of the gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states,

A. Must not interfere with commerce between individuals.

B. Must apply national law to commerce within their boarders.

C. Could prohibit any commerce within their boarders.

D. Could regulate commerce only within their boarders.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 3 March, 02:18
    0
    A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states, D. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

    This decision had to do with regulating commerce and trade, as well as navigation within the states themselves. It created new rules for interstate commerce by giving the Congress more rights and powers to regulate this.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A result of the gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states, A. Must not interfere with commerce between individuals. B. Must apply ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
In China, members of the gentry included: peasants government officials samurai Confucian scholars
Answers (1)
What title was given to the supreme Islamic authority, the successor of the prophet? A. Sharia B. Sunni C. Caliph D. Shia
Answers (1)
What did the islands of the caribbean form from? skeletons sand storms soil erosion volcanoes
Answers (1)
The individual most responsible for creating the notion of "judicial review" was
Answers (1)
How did the gobi desert affect china
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
How did submarine warfare impact the u ... s decision to enter the war
Answers (1)
Despite the fact that dollree mapp broke an ohio law prohibiting owning obscene material why did the supreme court ruled in her favor in mapp v ohio
Answers (1)
Why was the Roman Empire divided into the Western and Eastern Empires? A. to make a concession to the Byzantine Empire B. to separate the Christian and ancient Roman religions C. to gain better control over the vast empire D.
Answers (1)
The decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) more clearly defined what constitutional issue? A) freedom of speech B) applying the death penalty C) right to a jury trial in a civil suit D) right to be represented by an attorney
Answers (1)
Who was the paterfamilias in early Rome? A: descendants of the family B: a boy's father C: a boy's grandfather D: the oldest living male in a family
Answers (1)
Home » History » A result of the gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states, A. Must not interfere with commerce between individuals. B. Must apply national law to commerce within their boarders. C. Could prohibit any commerce within their boarders. D.
Sign Up Forgot Password?