Sign In
Ask Question
Natalya Woods
History
30 August, 04:02
Was the land in the north better for fighting
+3
Answers (
1
)
Eduardo Mcmillan
30 August, 04:27
0
If your talking about Europe then no it would be a lot more mutinous and cold and snowy and therefore just not very good if your talking about Northern America some parts like Texas and the border of Canada and the United stats then yes it would be but in Europe no.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Was the land in the north better for fighting ...”
in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Conduct Internet research and read the original letter that Chief John Ross wrote to President Lincoln in an effort to assuage his relationship with the Union.
Answers (1)
How did the relationship with the British and Colonists change after the French and Indian war
Answers (2)
Which era was considered "the golden age of polyphony"?
Answers (1)
Where did political parties first come from?
Answers (1)
Why did the united states feel vulnerable to international threats in the 1790s? who posed threats? and why?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
What enabled american indians to settle in permanent villages?
Answers (1)
What does it mean to place an embargo on a nation?
Answers (1)
Who took over for nixon when he was impeached?
Answers (1)
What was the first organized christian religion
Answers (1)
How did the american revolution influence the french revolution?
Answers (1)
Home
»
History
» Was the land in the north better for fighting
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?