Ask Question
5 February, 18:48

McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it

1) applied the Second Amendment to state government.

2) rejected the idea that the Second Anendment applies to state government.

3) conclued that the Second Amendment applies only to state governments and not to the federal government

4) upheld the state of llinois's restrictions on gun ownership by former felons.

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 5 February, 19:06
    0
    applied the Second Amendment to state government.
  2. 5 February, 19:09
    0
    The correct answer is 1

    Explanation: It considered that an individual's right to "keep and bear arms"
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it 1) applied the Second Amendment to state government. 2) rejected the idea that the ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers