McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it
1) applied the Second Amendment to state government.
2) rejected the idea that the Second Anendment applies to state government.
3) conclued that the Second Amendment applies only to state governments and not to the federal government
4) upheld the state of llinois's restrictions on gun ownership by former felons.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it 1) applied the Second Amendment to state government. 2) rejected the idea that the ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How did the nile river enable scientific or technological advances to be made in ancient egypt
Answers (1)
How could a video best extend the information Dr Dowell gives about careers in disease control
Answers (1)
Operation IcebergFought from March to June of 1945Largest amphibious assault in the Pacific TheaterWhich battle of the Pacific Theater is described in the box? a. Battle of Iwo Jima b. Battle of Okinawa c. Battle of Midway d. Battle of the Bulge
Answers (1)
Slavery allowed the South to enter into the new in class structure dominated by: *slaves and poor whites *planters *professionals such as doctors and lawyers *small, independent farmers
Answers (1)
What event occurred in Havana that caused Americans to be extremely angry?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Joliet explored the St. Lawrence River for France. True or False
Answers (1)
How did the texas rangers retaliate against huerta and his revolutionaries? how did the texas rangers retaliate against huerta and his revolutionaries?
Answers (1)
What changed in South Korea from 1993 to 2016
Answers (1)
What did the Great Map cover? Why was it important?
Answers (1)
Under the reconstruction act, how did the seceded states gain readmission into the union
Answers (1)