Ask Question
HistoryHistory
7 October, 04:18

Discuss the case of Sacco and Vanzetti.

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 7 October, 04:22
    0
    The self-employed Vanzetti had no such alibis and was charged for the attempted robbery and attempted murder in Bridgewater and the robbery and murder in the Braintree crimes. Sacco and Vanzetti were charged with the crime of murder on May 5, 1920, and indicted four months later on September 14.

    tell if you need more informtion
  2. 7 October, 04:33
    0
    The self-employed Vanzetti had no such alibis and was charged for the attempted robbery and attempted murder in Bridgewater and the robbery and murder in the Braintree crimes. Sacco and Vanzetti were charged with the crime of murder on May 5, 1920, and indicted four months later on September 14.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Discuss the case of Sacco and Vanzetti. ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
In China, members of the gentry included: peasants government officials samurai Confucian scholars
Answers (1)
What title was given to the supreme Islamic authority, the successor of the prophet? A. Sharia B. Sunni C. Caliph D. Shia
Answers (1)
What did the islands of the caribbean form from? skeletons sand storms soil erosion volcanoes
Answers (1)
The individual most responsible for creating the notion of "judicial review" was
Answers (1)
How did the gobi desert affect china
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
How did submarine warfare impact the u ... s decision to enter the war
Answers (1)
Despite the fact that dollree mapp broke an ohio law prohibiting owning obscene material why did the supreme court ruled in her favor in mapp v ohio
Answers (1)
Why was the Roman Empire divided into the Western and Eastern Empires? A. to make a concession to the Byzantine Empire B. to separate the Christian and ancient Roman religions C. to gain better control over the vast empire D.
Answers (1)
The decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) more clearly defined what constitutional issue? A) freedom of speech B) applying the death penalty C) right to a jury trial in a civil suit D) right to be represented by an attorney
Answers (1)
Who was the paterfamilias in early Rome? A: descendants of the family B: a boy's father C: a boy's grandfather D: the oldest living male in a family
Answers (1)
Home » History » Discuss the case of Sacco and Vanzetti.
Sign Up Forgot Password?