History

3 April, 00:46

According to the supreme court why is burning a cross in protest protected speech, but burning a cross directed at an individual unprotected?

free speech can be limited if it is hate speech

free speech can be limited if the content is unpopular

free speech can be limited if intent to intimidate is proven

free speech can be limited if it violates social norms

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “According to the supreme court why is burning a cross in protest protected speech, but burning a cross directed at an individual ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

What was one effect of the New Deal?

Which events marked the end of armed resistance by Native Americans in the northwest and the southwest

The communist manifesto question 5 who is the oppressed

Who was the last Moorish ruler of Spain?

Unlike any ither countries in latin america, brazil was colonized by the

New Questions in History

This u. s. president became the first to ever visit china, setting off a period of d tente. lyndon johnson richard nixon gerald ford jimmy carter

How was village life effected by western imperial rule A village life remained much the same as europeans focused on cities B villages were flooded with European colonizers and locals had to give up their homes C villagers were forced out by the

How would you describe Theosophy?

How did the nazi party maintain its control of germany?

What the difference between the new zealand declaraation of indepenance the the treaty of waitanga?