History

30 August, 20:31

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford was based on their interpretation that Dred Scott had no "standing" to bring a case to court because

a

he was not a citizen.

b

he was a slave.

c

he lived in a different state.

d

he had lived in areas where slavery was illegal.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford was based on their interpretation that Dred Scott had no "standing" to bring a case to ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Why was Galileo Galilei brought before the Inquisition?

How did the creation of the national bank mark the beginning of the formation of political parties in America?

What is monarchy? how do an absolute and constitutional monarchy differ?

List three reasons why Bostonians felt the British had pushed them too far.

Does no one no what a pagan is

New Questions in History

What were white southerners or defended slavery called

Which of the following Empires conquered the people of Judah

What were some of the difficulties in attempting to create the first transcontinental railroad in the United States? a. The western portions of the railroad would have to go through mountains. b.

What group did Nazi ideology consider superior to other people? A. Zionists B. Gypsies C. Jehovah's Witnesses D. Aryans

Why did African Americans migrate to northern American cities in the early 1900s