History

30 August, 20:31

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford was based on their interpretation that Dred Scott had no "standing" to bring a case to court because

a

he was not a citizen.

b

he was a slave.

c

he lived in a different state.

d

he had lived in areas where slavery was illegal.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford was based on their interpretation that Dred Scott had no "standing" to bring a case to ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Explain two consequences of the Warsaw Pact

Which are achievements of the Han dynasty? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Scholars advised the emperors how to govern. B. The Imperial University was founded to teach the Confucian classics. C.

1. What did Germany want to avoid at all costs.

Who created the west india company to compete with spain and portugal in the americas?

The amendment process to the U. S. Constitution reflects the principle of popular sovereignty - A. because it requires a national direct vote by citizens checks and balances B. because the House proposes and the Senate ratifies republicanism C.

New Questions in History

Soro bought a $50.00 bus card at the beginning of the week. each bus ride costs $2.50. he needs to have at least $20.00 on his card at the end of this month.

How did the U. S get involved in the war?

Why were iron tools more difficult to obtain than copper ones?

How many states is it

How do the elements of culture influence a group during the American Revolution?