Sign In
Ask Question
Yandel Welch
History
12 December, 13:21
Was the reign of terror necessary? Why?
+3
Answers (
2
)
Jaylin Blackwell
12 December, 13:37
0
So that they could overrun the corrupt kings and queens. The people were starving. If the people didn't do anything they would have died.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Aleah Skinner
12 December, 13:44
0
Yes it was. It was necessary because they brought that upon them selves. Thomas Hobbes ideas are shown true in these events.
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍
“Was the reign of terror necessary? Why? ...”
in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Who is Karl Marx, the background? what does he do and why does he do it?
Answers (1)
Why would his claim for the Dutch be a discouragement to Hudson
Answers (1)
One of the amendments called prohibition made it illegal to carry alcohol. a. True b. False
Answers (2)
What is one benefit to the Constitution giving powers to state governments?
Answers (1)
In the 1920s, which of these occupations would have been LEAST likely have been held by a woman? A) nurse B) professor C) secretary D) waiter
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
How did television contribute to the conformity in the 1950s ... A - television shows encourage people to be individuals. B - television aired only news and information programs. C - television portrayed a lifestyle that many people tried to imitate.
Answers (1)
What was the northwest passage apex answer : a passage on the sea through north america
Answers (2)
How was america built on slavery?
Answers (1)
Viceroys could be compared to
Answers (1)
What are the NCCD recommendations for crime reductions
Answers (1)
Home
»
History
» Was the reign of terror necessary? Why?
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?