Ask Question
1 October, 02:22

What is the general rule used by the Supreme Court when deciding if civil disobedience is a constitutionally-protected right?

a. if the protest is nonviolent civil disobedience is protected by the First Amendment right to free assembly

b. civil disobedience is not protected by the First Amendment and so protesters may be charged if they break any laws

c. when the law is being protested are on constitutional and civil disobedience is protected by the First Amendment

d. acts of Civil Disobedience are not protected if carried out on public property but have first Amendment protection on private property

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 1 October, 02:42
    0
    Correct answer choice is:

    C) When the law is being protested are on constitutional and civil disobedience is protected by the First Amendment.

    Explanation:

    Civil disobedience is the current, declared rejection of a nation to adopt specific laws, orders, rules or regulations of a state or keeping the foreign law. Civil disobedience is seldom described as having to be peaceful to be called civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is seldom, hence, associated with the peaceful opposition.
  2. 1 October, 02:48
    0
    I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the third option. The general rule used by the Supreme Court when deciding if civil disobedience is a constitutionally-protected right would be that when the law is being protested are on constitutional and civil disobedience is protected by the First Amendment. Hope this answers the question.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “What is the general rule used by the Supreme Court when deciding if civil disobedience is a constitutionally-protected right? a. if the ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers