History

26 February, 15:08

Why did it makes sense to send electors

to Washington, D. C. and not have the

people decide on the president?

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why did it makes sense to send electors to Washington, D. C. and not have the people decide on the president? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Democracy is rule by what?

What kinds of conflicts resulted from the global confrontation between the two superpowers?

5 member nations hold the veto power of the United Nations?

What were the most important figures of the French revolution?

Why couldn't the federal government act upon the high taxes Massachusetts had passed?

New Questions in History

Which of the following choices best represents the organization of the executive branch goverment A. congress, bicameral, judicial B. President, executive deparments, individual federal agencies C. president, supreme court, Congress D.

More than 200,000 African Americans fought for the Union. Many of these men faced discrimination. Considering these conditions, why did they most likely continue to fight for the Union?

What can you infer about the Third Estate in French Society before and during the French Revolution?

Which one of the following is someone who authorizes another to act as agent?

Which accurately describes apartheid?