History

24 May, 17:18

Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplification a when analyzing sources?

A. Sound generalizations are very convincing as a form of rhetoric.

B. Sound generalizations make claims of fact rather than claims of value.

C. Sound generalizations allow historians to ignore contradictory evidence.

D. Sound generalizations can accommodate a variety of complex sources.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why should historians make sound generalizations rather than oversimplification a when analyzing sources? A. Sound generalizations are very ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Wich of the following groups had a political outlook similar to that of populist farmers in the late 1800s

As it is used in line 7 to describe President Roosevelt, the term tree farmer most nearly means that Roosevelt?

What do you know about a shape of peaple?

Why are security experts concerned about "dirty bombs"? They are easier to build than nuclear weapons. They are more powerful than nuclear weapons. They can be sent in letters through the mail. They specifically target oil supplies.

How did the crusades in Southwest Asia and Marco Polo in Asia contribute to the growth of trade in Europe?

New Questions in History

What new responsibilities did the us government take on in the Johnson years

What were some impact that montesquieu had in the enlightenment era

The Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) : a) replaced NATO in Europe. b) was the Soviet counterpart to NATO. c) was part of a UN initiative. d) ended the Korean War. e) represented the global reach of Cold War divisions.

The treatment slaves received depended on the personality of the indivic True False

How and in what ways did the Romans adopt the Greek culture?