Ask Question
17 May, 21:08

Conservative republican opponents of the treaty of versailles argued that the league of nations would

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 17 May, 21:21
    0
    Answer is Limit US sovereignty.

    Therefore, refer below.

    Explanation:

    Conservative republican opponents of the treaty of versailles argued that the league of nations would Limit US sovereignty.
  2. 17 May, 21:33
    0
    Conservative Republican opponents of the Treaty of Versailles argued that the League of Nations would limit US sovereignty.

    Explanation:

    The Treaty of Versailles of 1919 is the peace treaty that led to the official end of World War I. The treaty was the result of a six-month peace conference in Paris. It was ratified on January 10, 1920, demanding that Germany assume responsibility for the war and thus was obliged to pay major war damage compensation to the other war participants.

    The treaty led to the formation of the League of Nations, an important goal for President Woodrow Wilson. The purpose of the organization was to mediate in conflicts between nations before they went to war.

    The United States never ratified the treaty. Elections in 1918 gave the Republican control of the Senate, and they blocked ratification two times. They would rather prefer isolationism and oppose the League of Nations. As a result, the United States never entered the League of Nations, and the country subsequently negotiated a separate peace treaty with Germany: the Berlin Treaty of 1921, which ratified the war reparations and other parts of the Treaty of Versailles, but explicitly excluded all articles related to the League of Nations.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Conservative republican opponents of the treaty of versailles argued that the league of nations would ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers