Ask Question
20 July, 06:10

The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 20 July, 06:12
    0
    The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that
  2. 20 July, 06:13
    0
    Answer: The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.

    Explanation: In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers