Ask Question
12 July, 03:35

Why were there fewer slaves in the backcountry of the southern colonies than those areas closer to the coast

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 12 July, 03:43
    0
    It seems that you have missed the given choices of this question; but anyway, here is the correct answer. There were fewer slaves in the back country of the southern colonies than those areas closer to the coast because Colonists in the back country were poor and couldn't afford slaves.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why were there fewer slaves in the backcountry of the southern colonies than those areas closer to the coast ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers