Ask Question
10 April, 01:16

1. in the case of schenck vs united states, justice oliver wendell holmes wrote: "the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic." This is an example of what kind of rights?

-a. absolute rights

-b. natural rights

-c. civil rights

-d. relative rights

2. what are civil liberties?

-a. freedoms that have been granted by Congress

-b. freedoms that protect people from government

-c. rights that are granted to citizens

-d. rights that are not clearly mentioned in the Constitution

3. what was the original purpose of the Bill of Rights?

-a. to give the people their natural rights

-b. to restrict the power of the national government

-c. to restrict the power of the national and state government

-d. to give power to the national government

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 10 April, 01:25
    0
    1. D - Relative rights

    2. B - Freedoms that protect people from government

    3. B - To restrict the power of the national government

    3/3 (100%)
  2. 10 April, 01:36
    0
    The answer to these questions is as follows:

    1. D

    2. B

    3. B
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “1. in the case of schenck vs united states, justice oliver wendell holmes wrote: "the most stringent protection of free speech would not ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers