Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?

Question

Dakota Mcguire

History

10 July, 17:32

Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Emilio Curtis · Answer 1

A researcher uses Primary sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts of the witnesses that physically watched it happen. their accounts are often more reliable.

Troy Mccarthy · Answer 2

researcher uses Primary Sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts that are documented that shows how something or someone tested and successful did.