This 1967 Supreme Court ruling held that juveniles accused of delinquent acts have many of the same rights afforded to adults under the 6th and 14th Amendments.

A) in re Gault

B) Roe v. Wade

Eliminate

C) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

D) Brown v. Board of Education

Question

Catalina Hensley

History

6 February, 17:33

This 1967 Supreme Court ruling held that juveniles accused of delinquent acts have many of the same rights afforded to adults under the 6th and 14th Amendments.

A) in re Gault

B) Roe v. Wade

Eliminate

C) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

D) Brown v. Board of Education

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jayson Huffman · Answer 1

Answer:A

Explanation:The case of in re Gault - in re means "in the matter of" - dealt with juveniles accused of delinquent acts. The Court held 8-1 that certain due process rights must be afforded to all people accused of a crime, regardless of their age.

This 1967 Supreme Court ruling held that juveniles accused of delinquent acts have many of the same rights afforded to adults under the 6th and 14th Amendments.A) in re GaultB) Roe v. WadeEliminateC) Hazelwood v. KuhlmeierD) Brown v. Board of Education

This 1967 Supreme Court ruling held that juveniles accused of delinquent acts have many of the same rights afforded to adults under the 6th and 14th Amendments.

A) in re Gault

B) Roe v. Wade

Eliminate

C) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

D) Brown v. Board of Education