Ask Question
12 July, 13:20

A secondary source is not useful and should not be used for academic purposes. t/f

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 12 July, 13:28
    0
    Secondary sources could be useful in some reaches of academic purposes. I would say the answer is false.

    Secondary sources are like documents written after an event occurred. Secondary sources offer another perspective on things.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A secondary source is not useful and should not be used for academic purposes. t/f ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers