Which statement accurately contrasts the Ottoman and Safavid empires in the 16th century?

a. Safavid rulers were Muslims who persecuted Hindus living within the empire, whereas Ottoman rulers practiced Sikhism, which shares some beliefs with both Hinduism and Islam.

b. Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law Ali.

c. Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law

Question

Daphne Galloway

History

23 September, 08:25

Which statement accurately contrasts the Ottoman and Safavid empires in the 16th century?

a. Safavid rulers were Muslims who persecuted Hindus living within the empire, whereas Ottoman rulers practiced Sikhism, which shares some beliefs with both Hinduism and Islam.

b. Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law Ali.

c. Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Brennan Mcdonald · Answer 1

The Ottomans were primarily Sunni Muslims, who believed Abu Bakr should be the successor to Muhammad. The Safavids were Shi'ite Muslims, who believed that Ali should be thr successor. In short, the answer is C