Ask Question
9 November, 06:02

Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?

A:In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme Court ruled that it is the attorney's duty to inform suspects of their rights.

B:In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court decided that it is the citizens' responsibility to be aware of their own rights.

C:In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court decided that every person who was convicted at trial and did not have an attorney deserves a new trial.

D:In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that every state must provide an attorney when the defendant cannot afford one.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 9 November, 06:15
    0
    I think the answer is D
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described? A:In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme Court ruled ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers