Sweatt v. Painter held all of the following except

A.

"Separate but equal" was always unequal.

B.

The University of Texas School of Law was ordered to admit African-American students.

C.

The school that later became Texas Southern University was ruled not equivalent to the University of Texas.

D.

Undergraduate students could not avail themselves of this court ruling.

Question

Avah Mclaughlin

History

25 September, 16:42

Sweatt v. Painter held all of the following except

A.

"Separate but equal" was always unequal.

B.

The University of Texas School of Law was ordered to admit African-American students.

C.

The school that later became Texas Southern University was ruled not equivalent to the University of Texas.

D.

Undergraduate students could not avail themselves of this court ruling.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Brooke Perry · Answer 1

B

Explanation:

The University of Texas School of Law was ordered to admit African-American students.

Parker Bryant · Answer 2

Sweatt v. Painter held all of the following except the University of Texas School of Law was ordered to admit African-American students.

Option: B

Explanation:

A form of supreme court was Sweatt v. Painter raised voice against separate but equal. It was a racial movement against segregation. This Texas school of Law only allow black students not the white students. Sweatt was declined to take admission in law school as he was an American.

Texas school of law later transformed into University of Texas and progressed as equivalent as school. Undergraduate students after completing their education started higher education in Texas university.